Thursday, February 10, 2011

How To Register A Car In Tn Without The Title

SMEMORATO (INTERVIEW WITH ANGELA NAVA)


Il Paese degli Smemorati: "Abbiamo perso
l'idea di quale sia il valore della scuola"
Per Angela Nava, presidente del CGD, non sarà facile risalire la china e non basterà solo maggiore attenzione economica, perché il vero problema sono i danni culturali arrecati by this government
published January 24, 2011,
John Belfiori

Angela Nava is chairman of the National
association founded in 1976 by Marisa Musu and Gianni Rodari.
Coordination Parents Democrats ,
This year, elections or no elections, will be one in which the country will have to deal with serious damage, structural, that the center-right government has done to the system of Education. Damage hardly be remediable only with some extra cash, deposits that to be removed will need strong solutions.
The situation is dramatic, dramatic culturally, as well as economically, because in a country that is the 'forgetfulness', took only two years of Gelmini, preceded by those morattiani, to almost lose sight of what the school should be and also that the school had been. The movement is good for all of the parents as regards the participation, but everything has been calibrated to the needs, the urgency to cover living expenses, the emergencies of every day, in short, on what the school did not give cost rather than on what that the school could have given more. Only now
is a growing awareness of what the school system has fallen into the quality of how the school has become a 'school for a few', for those that already have, for those who have a family educated, wealthy behind. All the others, the logic of this government, the school are those who will live as a quick step that will lead to insecurity in the work of Z-series, the marginal social, cultural, productive. The numerical evaluation or overcrowded classes in primary schools have left the edge all those children who are not particularly problematic and that in a class of 20 pupils, with teacher-presences, were happily recovered and taken to the level of altri o meglio degli altri. Il vero danno è stato rinchiuderci un po’ tutti in un individualismo di bottega, la corsa a cercare il meglio solo per il proprio figlio, dimenticando che c’è un interesse generale che diventa il benessere di tutti i bambini. Per risalire questa china ci vorrà molto tempo, e non basterà solo una maggiore attenzione economica al mondo della scuola.
Mi pare che questo governo consideri i genitori, la loro partecipazione, quasi come un’appendice inutile e perfino d’ostacolo a un discorso efficientista e produttivo. La pensi così?
No, perché la destra ha anche coccolato i genitori, riferendosi al ventre molle, facendo leva sul loro egoismo. Si è cominciato with the policy of the advance: who is that parent who does not say that his son is the most beautiful and
the bravest of the house and certainly can not go to school in 5 years? And this has certainly led to the reflection that perhaps the social, staying together for the age groups could be critical. O
tell their parents that to be effective a school should turn to private schools, perhaps with a capitation going on 'my' son. The parent was taken into consideration in the aspects molche and lower, who were at the expense of overall quality, but everyone gave the illusion-loser-later revealed that his son, and his only son, he would saved.
This masked by a liberal philosophy. Too bad that not a dangerous central terzinternazionalista, but the Fondazione Giovanni Agnelli, in his 2010 report on the School, is a bit 'accounts of what it costs to Italy, in economic terms, a school that is not the engine of social mobility, which has too many dropouts, which is deeply divided between north and south, which does not recognize the dignity and professional technical education. To deny the opportunity for all is to ignore the talent that can be escaped as in downtown Milan, the son of the worker as the son of the professor.
This is not liberalism, is a nineteenth-century conception, vecchia, inadeguata alla globalizzazione, perdente.
Sì, ottocentesca e illusoria, perché anche il genitore che crede di salvare suo figlio, capisce che è un’illusione di breve durata, quello stesso figlio che mettiamo nella gabbia dorata, dopo qualche anno si dovrà immettere in una società dove –proprio a causa di - ci saranno sempre più tensioni, più conflitti sociali, più divisioni, e sarà sempre meno attrezzato a viverli, ad affrontarli.

0 comments:

Post a Comment